PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.31%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-0.44%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-15.76%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 7.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-11.97%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-0.58%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
34.48%
Interest expense change of 34.48% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-39.50%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-57.98%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.71%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-56.09%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-471.05%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-496.74%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-31.43%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -10.64%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-260.27%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 8.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-276.48%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-62.50%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-210.00%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 15.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-223.95%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 8.85%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-200.00%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.13%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-200.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
3.33%
Share count change of 3.33% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
3.33%
Diluted share change of 3.33% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.