23.68 - 23.68
20.75 - 25.07
1.4K / 5.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-5.89%
Cash & equivalents declining signals potential liquidity drain. Benjamin Graham would investigate if this is from strategic investments or operational shortfalls.
1.07%
Short-term investments yoy growth 0-5% – slight uptick. Peter Lynch would confirm if it aligns with revenue and future spending needs.
-5.89%
Declining total liquid assets may signal capital redeployment or liquidity concerns. Howard Marks would investigate the underlying causes.
4.52%
Net receivables up to 5% yoy – minimal growth. Howard Marks would watch if revenue growth justifies the small receivables increase.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.45%
Declining current assets may signal efficient working capital or liquidity concerns. Benjamin Graham would investigate the composition of the decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.82%
Up to 5% yoy – small intangible increase. Howard Marks would question if synergy or brand value justifies it.
4.77%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is cautious or sees limited investment opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.67%
Declining other non-current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity.
4.67%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight. Peter Lynch might see it as conservative expansion or replacement-level spending.
2.99%
Up to 5% yoy – slight expansion. Howard Marks questions if new miscellaneous assets are beneficial or just bloat.
3.18%
0-5% yoy – slight growth. Peter Lynch might see it as stable if profitability remains healthy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.20%
Above 5% yoy – expanding LT debt. Philip Fisher demands clarity on whether growth justifies added leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
Declining deferred tax liabilities reduces future tax burdens. Seth Klarman would see this as improving long-term cash flow outlook.
-10.21%
Declining other non-current liabilities reduces long-term obligations. Howard Marks would see this as improving future financial flexibility.
10.21%
Above 5% yoy – rising long-term liabilities. Philip Fisher wants clarity on new debts or deferrals.
3.11%
Up to 5% yoy – slight increase. Howard Marks questions if new obligations are significant.
3.22%
Up to 10% yoy – modest increase. Howard Marks questions if incremental liabilities are productive.
0.04%
Up to 5% yoy – small issuance. Howard Marks asks if new capital is used productively.
-1.40%
Declining retained earnings signals net losses or large dividends. Seth Klarman would investigate the sustainability of dividend policy.
20.08%
Above 20% yoy – large jump. Philip Fisher demands clarity on whether these unrealized gains are sustainable.
-12.62%
Declining other equity items simplifies the capital structure. Benjamin Graham would favor this reduction in complexity.
2.56%
0-5% yoy – modestly growing or flat equity. Seth Klarman sees mild improvement if consistent with earnings.
3.18%
3-8% yoy – moderate. Seth Klarman sees typical expansions. Evaluate capital deployment.
3.09%
0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch sees a cautious approach or fewer opportunities.
12.20%
Above 5% yoy – debt expansion. Philip Fisher demands clarity on whether new debt is productive or just adding leverage.
20.56%
Above 5% yoy – net debt expansion. Philip Fisher demands clarity on the reason for higher leverage vs. cash.