23.68 - 23.68
20.75 - 25.07
1.4K / 5.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
4.18%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth 0-5% – slight improvement. Peter Lynch would verify if this aligns with revenue trends and if working capital remains healthy.
3.45%
Short-term investments yoy growth 0-5% – slight uptick. Peter Lynch would confirm if it aligns with revenue and future spending needs.
4.18%
Cash + STI yoy growth 0-5% – slight gain. Peter Lynch would verify if the firm's operational cash flow sustains normal expansions.
-14.16%
Declining receivables is generally positive, indicating better collections. Benjamin Graham would verify revenue stability alongside the reduction.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.51%
Growth 0-5% – slight uptick. Peter Lynch would see it as generally stable if working capital remains sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.76%
Declining total intangibles reduces balance sheet risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving asset quality.
2.97%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is cautious or sees limited investment opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.80%
Declining other non-current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity.
2.80%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight. Peter Lynch might see it as conservative expansion or replacement-level spending.
0.58%
Up to 5% yoy – slight expansion. Howard Marks questions if new miscellaneous assets are beneficial or just bloat.
1.25%
0-5% yoy – slight growth. Peter Lynch might see it as stable if profitability remains healthy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.16%
Declining long-term debt reduces leverage risk. Howard Marks would see this as improving financial stability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.58%
Up to 20% yoy – a noticeable rise. Howard Marks questions if future tax liabilities might weigh on returns.
-0.30%
Declining other non-current liabilities reduces long-term obligations. Howard Marks would see this as improving future financial flexibility.
0.30%
Up to 5% yoy – small increase. Howard Marks questions if the firm's cash flow can handle incremental obligations.
1.22%
Up to 5% yoy – slight increase. Howard Marks questions if new obligations are significant.
1.20%
Up to 10% yoy – modest increase. Howard Marks questions if incremental liabilities are productive.
0.07%
Up to 5% yoy – small issuance. Howard Marks asks if new capital is used productively.
5.10%
5-10% yoy – moderate improvement. Seth Klarman notes normal reinvestment if returns are decent.
2.20%
Up to 20% yoy – moderate increase. Howard Marks warns these gains can reverse if markets shift.
-48.05%
Declining other equity items simplifies the capital structure. Benjamin Graham would favor this reduction in complexity.
1.75%
0-5% yoy – modestly growing or flat equity. Seth Klarman sees mild improvement if consistent with earnings.
1.25%
0-3% yoy – small growth. Peter Lynch wonders if expansions are limited or offset by divestitures.
3.17%
0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch sees a cautious approach or fewer opportunities.
-1.16%
Declining total debt reduces leverage risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving financial stability and flexibility.
-25.37%
Declining net debt indicates improving liquidity or deleveraging. Howard Marks would see this as strengthening financial position.