PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Manulife Financial Corp (MFC-PM.TO)
23.680.18 (-0.75%)
23.68 - 23.68
20.75 - 25.07
1.4K / 5.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-12.13%
Cash & equivalents declining signals potential liquidity drain. Benjamin Graham would investigate if this is from strategic investments or operational shortfalls.
2.87%
Short-term investments yoy growth 0-5% – slight uptick. Peter Lynch would confirm if it aligns with revenue and future spending needs.
-12.13%
Declining total liquid assets may signal capital redeployment or liquidity concerns. Howard Marks would investigate the underlying causes.
-5.10%
Declining receivables is generally positive, indicating better collections. Benjamin Graham would verify revenue stability alongside the reduction.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.68%
Declining current assets may signal efficient working capital or liquidity concerns. Benjamin Graham would investigate the composition of the decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.91%
Declining total intangibles reduces balance sheet risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving asset quality.
3.60%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is cautious or sees limited investment opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.41%
Declining other non-current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity.
3.41%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight. Peter Lynch might see it as conservative expansion or replacement-level spending.
2.47%
Up to 5% yoy – slight expansion. Howard Marks questions if new miscellaneous assets are beneficial or just bloat.
2.34%
0-5% yoy – slight growth. Peter Lynch might see it as stable if profitability remains healthy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.42%
Declining long-term debt reduces leverage risk. Howard Marks would see this as improving financial stability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.19%
Above 20% yoy – significant jump. Philip Fisher demands clarity on new deferrals that increase future tax burdens.
8.85%
Up to 10% yoy – some increase. Howard Marks questions if new obligations are well-covered by cash flow.
-8.85%
Declining total non-current liabilities reduces long-term leverage risk. Benjamin Graham would see this as strengthening the balance sheet.
2.43%
Up to 5% yoy – slight increase. Howard Marks questions if new obligations are significant.
2.21%
Up to 10% yoy – modest increase. Howard Marks questions if incremental liabilities are productive.
0.01%
Up to 5% yoy – small issuance. Howard Marks asks if new capital is used productively.
10.64%
10-20% yoy – healthy expansion in retained earnings. Warren Buffett sees it as fueling future growth.
20.25%
Above 20% yoy – large jump. Philip Fisher demands clarity on whether these unrealized gains are sustainable.
-6.05%
Declining other equity items simplifies the capital structure. Benjamin Graham would favor this reduction in complexity.
4.32%
0-5% yoy – modestly growing or flat equity. Seth Klarman sees mild improvement if consistent with earnings.
2.34%
0-3% yoy – small growth. Peter Lynch wonders if expansions are limited or offset by divestitures.
3.30%
0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch sees a cautious approach or fewer opportunities.
-13.42%
Declining total debt reduces leverage risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving financial stability and flexibility.
10.17%
Above 5% yoy – net debt expansion. Philip Fisher demands clarity on the reason for higher leverage vs. cash.