23.68 - 23.68
20.75 - 25.07
1.4K / 5.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
2.17%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth 0-5% – slight improvement. Peter Lynch would verify if this aligns with revenue trends and if working capital remains healthy.
1.46%
Short-term investments yoy growth 0-5% – slight uptick. Peter Lynch would confirm if it aligns with revenue and future spending needs.
2.17%
Cash + STI yoy growth 0-5% – slight gain. Peter Lynch would verify if the firm's operational cash flow sustains normal expansions.
6.59%
Net receivables growing more than 5% yoy – potential collection risk if top-line isn't equally strong. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on credit policy vs. revenue gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.40%
Growth 0-5% – slight uptick. Peter Lynch would see it as generally stable if working capital remains sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.84%
Up to 5% yoy – small intangible increase. Howard Marks would question if synergy or brand value justifies it.
2.06%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is cautious or sees limited investment opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.02%
Declining other non-current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity.
2.02%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight. Peter Lynch might see it as conservative expansion or replacement-level spending.
2.20%
Up to 5% yoy – slight expansion. Howard Marks questions if new miscellaneous assets are beneficial or just bloat.
2.15%
0-5% yoy – slight growth. Peter Lynch might see it as stable if profitability remains healthy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.24%
Declining long-term debt reduces leverage risk. Howard Marks would see this as improving financial stability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.77%
Declining deferred tax liabilities reduces future tax burdens. Seth Klarman would see this as improving long-term cash flow outlook.
0.54%
Up to 10% yoy – some increase. Howard Marks questions if new obligations are well-covered by cash flow.
-0.54%
Declining total non-current liabilities reduces long-term leverage risk. Benjamin Graham would see this as strengthening the balance sheet.
2.00%
Up to 5% yoy – slight increase. Howard Marks questions if new obligations are significant.
1.95%
Up to 10% yoy – modest increase. Howard Marks questions if incremental liabilities are productive.
0.03%
Up to 5% yoy – small issuance. Howard Marks asks if new capital is used productively.
6.18%
5-10% yoy – moderate improvement. Seth Klarman notes normal reinvestment if returns are decent.
12.68%
Up to 20% yoy – moderate increase. Howard Marks warns these gains can reverse if markets shift.
108.65%
Above 10% yoy – bigger jump. Philip Fisher demands clarity on unusual equity expansions.
5.31%
5-10% yoy – solid improvement. Benjamin Graham sees stable reinvestment or capital additions.
2.15%
0-3% yoy – small growth. Peter Lynch wonders if expansions are limited or offset by divestitures.
1.82%
0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch sees a cautious approach or fewer opportunities.
-0.24%
Declining total debt reduces leverage risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving financial stability and flexibility.
-4.98%
Declining net debt indicates improving liquidity or deleveraging. Howard Marks would see this as strengthening financial position.