23.68 - 23.68
20.75 - 25.07
1.4K / 5.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-119.29%
Negative revenue growth while Financial Services median is -1.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-119.29%
Negative gross profit growth while Financial Services median is -1.88%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
46.26%
Positive EBIT growth while Financial Services median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
46.26%
Positive operating income growth while Financial Services is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
42.69%
Positive net income growth while Financial Services median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
41.51%
Positive EPS growth while Financial Services median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
42.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Financial Services median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.84%
Share change of 0.84% while Financial Services median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.52%
Negative OCF growth while Financial Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-62.52%
Negative FCF growth while Financial Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-205.76%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Financial Services median is 11.88%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-130.68%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Financial Services median is 11.29%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-117.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Financial Services median is 4.81%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-5.33%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Financial Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-21.38%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Financial Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-35.98%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Financial Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
136.89%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Financial Services median of 41.39% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
113.68%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Financial Services median of 19.48%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
32.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Financial Services median of 2.63%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
117.57%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Financial Services median of 39.80% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
26.75%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Financial Services median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
14.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Financial Services median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.46%
AR growth of 0.46% while Financial Services median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.72%
Assets shrink while Financial Services median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-4.24%
Negative BV/share change while Financial Services median is -1.51%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
7.01%
Debt growth of 7.01% while Financial Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.10%
SG&A decline while Financial Services grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.