176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-4.94%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-4.94% vs AVGO's -0.08%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
5.39%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating better performance.
3.31%
Below half of AVGO's -0.08%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
7.06%
Receivables growth less than half of AVGO's 84.95%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
0.54%
Inventory growth below half of AVGO's 60.13%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
1.93%
Other current assets growth < half of AVGO's 996.32%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
3.24%
Below half of AVGO's 87.81%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.84%
Below half AVGO's 38.99%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.34%
Less than half of AVGO's 289.29%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
-0.60%
Less than half of AVGO's 720.86%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.02%
Less than half of AVGO's 517.77%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
1.11%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.11%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.05%
Less than half of AVGO's 253.42%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.88%
Below half of AVGO's 295.97%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.55%
Below half of AVGO's 180.63%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
7.42%
Less than half of AVGO's 67.52%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.96%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.76%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating better performance.
37.48%
50-75% of AVGO's 60.56%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a more controlled liability line.
5.36%
Less than half of AVGO's 125.96%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-3.79%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-63.22%
Both AVGO and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
3.72%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.35%
Less than half of AVGO's 684.16%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-12.31%
Less than half of AVGO's 6101.98%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Less than half of AVGO's 1293.42%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.83%
Less than half of AVGO's 10.68%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
2.26%
Below half AVGO's -16.16%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-0.59%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.56%
Below half AVGO's -1.78%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.55%
Below half AVGO's 180.63%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
5.39%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating better performance.
-3.79%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to AVGO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.98%
Less than half of AVGO's 431.85%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
