176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-15.71%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-15.71% vs MRVL's -1.64%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
5.91%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of MRVL's 44.43%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
0.43%
Below half of MRVL's 14.46%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-25.25%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's 9.37%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
11.87%
Similar inventory growth to MRVL's 15.81%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.60%
Below half of MRVL's 13.76%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.22%
Below half MRVL's 0.82%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.99%
Less than half of MRVL's -2.36%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.71%
Less than half of MRVL's -0.04%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.97%
Less than half of MRVL's -0.08%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.07%
Below half of MRVL's 0.07%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.89%
Below half of MRVL's 7.06%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-22.80%
Less than half of MRVL's 33.59%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.04%
Less than half of MRVL's 17.72%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.41%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -0.50%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-14.39%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -0.50%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.01%
Less than half of MRVL's 13.26%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.30%
Less than half of MRVL's 0.93%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-6.93%
Below half MRVL's 1417.00%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
3.33%
Less than half of MRVL's 194.82%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.50%
Below half MRVL's 6.03%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.89%
Below half MRVL's 7.06%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
5.91%
Below half MRVL's 42.42%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-1.51%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
16.52%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 1.64%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
