176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-22.09%
Cash & equivalents declining -22.09% while MRVL's grows 10.30%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-4.95%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of MRVL's 3.46%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-9.24%
Below half of MRVL's 5.82%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
22.36%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's -4.63%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-5.00%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's 7.66%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
177.93%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.12%
Below half of MRVL's 4.10%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.45%
Below half MRVL's 2.62%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
60.48%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 0.02%. Michael Burry warns of potential big write-downs if synergy fails.
28.47%
Less than half of MRVL's -8.98%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
46.72%
Less than half of MRVL's -0.50%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-177.93%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
177.93%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
146.02%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 10.58%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
28.72%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's 0.39%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.73%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's 2.39%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-14.00%
Less than half of MRVL's 10.04%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.13%
Less than half of MRVL's 2.54%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.83%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-46.78%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-15.26%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -1.33%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-14.27%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -1.33%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.03%
Less than half of MRVL's 1.68%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.44%
Less than half of MRVL's -0.90%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
6.63%
Below half MRVL's 22.35%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
29.79%
Less than half of MRVL's -12.58%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.01%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's 2.50%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.73%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's 2.39%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-4.95%
Below half MRVL's 3.40%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-2.02%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
22.79%
Less than half of MRVL's -10.30%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
