176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
17.83%
Cash & equivalents growing 17.83% while MRVL's declined -7.76%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
12.84%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of MRVL's -7.13%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
13.87%
Below half of MRVL's -7.35%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-9.46%
Similar receivables growth to MRVL's -9.72%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
6.48%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's 14.24%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
164.05%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 10.94%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
11.58%
Below half of MRVL's -5.19%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.51%
0.5-0.75x MRVL's 2.72%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
-1.08%
Less than half of MRVL's 1.11%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
-4.87%
Less than half of MRVL's 87.17%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-2.39%
Less than half of MRVL's 5.28%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.25%
Less than half of MRVL's -81.46%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
3.69%
1.25-1.5x MRVL's 2.63%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.12%
Below half of MRVL's -1.70%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
8.81%
Less than half of MRVL's -14.27%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.88%
Less than half of MRVL's -10.91%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.24%
Less than half of MRVL's -1.36%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
108.49%
Less than half of MRVL's -1.36%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.14%
Less than half of MRVL's -8.99%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.29%
Less than half of MRVL's -1.02%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
4.44%
0.5-0.75x MRVL's 6.47%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
17.97%
Less than half of MRVL's 363.05%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.34%
Below half MRVL's -0.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
9.12%
Below half MRVL's -1.70%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
13.32%
Below half MRVL's -6.63%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-2.32%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-18.64%
Less than half of MRVL's 7.76%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
