176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
5.33%
Cash & equivalents growing 5.33% while MRVL's declined -0.47%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-25.61%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.32%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
-20.94%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.37%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
20.50%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 16.34%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
0.18%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's 23.89%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
18.00%
Other current assets growth < half of MRVL's -0.02%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-14.85%
Below half of MRVL's 4.31%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.54%
Below half MRVL's -5.49%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.22%
Less than half of MRVL's 99.52%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-1.45%
Less than half of MRVL's 3.88%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-1.97%
Below half of MRVL's 82.75%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
1.97%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.46%
Less than half of MRVL's -80.29%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.55%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.85%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.31%
Below half of MRVL's 1.62%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-5.48%
Less than half of MRVL's 15.54%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.67%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.86%
Below half of MRVL's 27.32%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
17.41%
Less than half of MRVL's -0.39%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
1.10%
Less than half of MRVL's 9.87%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-3.53%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-38.84%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
2.36%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.53%
Less than half of MRVL's -11.23%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-12.86%
1.1-1.25x MRVL's -11.23%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is outpacing competitor in long-term leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.98%
Less than half of MRVL's 5.59%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.14%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.62%
0.75-0.9x MRVL's 2.05%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor reinvests profits more robustly.
-42.71%
Less than half of MRVL's -172.24%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.52%
Below half MRVL's 0.92%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-11.31%
Below half MRVL's 1.62%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-25.61%
Below half MRVL's 0.87%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-3.53%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.62%
Less than half of MRVL's 0.47%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
