176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-8.22%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-8.22% vs MRVL's -38.96%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-5.27%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of MRVL's -16.88%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-5.62%
Below half of MRVL's -29.24%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
3.56%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's -13.19%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-5.74%
Inventory growth above 1.5x MRVL's -2.10%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-100.00%
Similar to MRVL's -100.00%. Walter Schloss would confirm standard short-term asset patterns.
-4.34%
Below half of MRVL's -27.24%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.79%
Below half MRVL's -4.45%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.63%
Less than half of MRVL's 1.40%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-1.40%
Less than half of MRVL's 1.33%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.49%
Less than half of MRVL's 8.58%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.08%
Below half of MRVL's 0.80%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.55%
Below half of MRVL's -14.42%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
8.11%
Similar yoy growth to MRVL's 7.39%. Walter Schloss sees parallel payables strategy. Check top-line correlation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
350.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.70%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's 0.95%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
-7.60%
Less than half of MRVL's 4.38%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
0.74%
Less than half of MRVL's -60.46%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-9.20%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-97.73%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
10.63%
Less than half of MRVL's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.54%
Less than half of MRVL's -3.35%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.51%
Less than half of MRVL's -4.74%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.38%
Less than half of MRVL's -57.20%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.08%
Below half MRVL's -4.78%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
125.00%
Less than half of MRVL's 379.50%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.11%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.97%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-3.55%
Below half MRVL's -14.42%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-5.27%
Below half MRVL's -16.82%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-0.07%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.25%
Less than half of MRVL's 38.96%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
