176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-6.14%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-6.14% vs MRVL's -57.28%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
10.56%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of MRVL's -96.49%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
8.81%
Below half of MRVL's -72.14%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
36.23%
Similar receivables growth to MRVL's 34.47%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
36.76%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's 179.22%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
3.82%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 1.55%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
14.64%
Below half of MRVL's -36.93%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
9.01%
Below half MRVL's 53.35%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.27%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.59%
Less than half of MRVL's 312.16%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.41%
Less than half of MRVL's 31.70%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.94%
Below half of MRVL's 264.99%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.41%
Below half of MRVL's 113.04%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
28.41%
1.1-1.25x MRVL's 25.00%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm relies on extended payables to manage cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.63%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
37.50%
Below half of MRVL's 5735.21%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
28.83%
1.1-1.25x MRVL's 24.35%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm is incurring more one-time charges than competitor.
32.19%
Similar yoy to MRVL's 36.79%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
0.05%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
50.00%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
10.53%
Less than half of MRVL's 118.60%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-4.32%
Less than half of MRVL's 18.02%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-0.46%
Less than half of MRVL's 1457.43%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.19%
Less than half of MRVL's 366.09%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.14%
Below half MRVL's -2.11%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.97%
Below half MRVL's 78.86%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
12.41%
Below half MRVL's 113.04%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
10.56%
Below half MRVL's -96.49%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.05%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.89%
Less than half of MRVL's 218.22%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
