176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
37.44%
Cash & equivalents growing 37.44% while MRVL's declined -23.56%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-99.71%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
15.27%
Below half of MRVL's -23.56%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-6.79%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's 9.38%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-13.04%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's 28.23%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-1.32%
Other current assets growth < half of MRVL's 0.54%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
9.03%
Below half of MRVL's -0.78%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.24%
Below half MRVL's -1.11%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.24%
Less than half of MRVL's 4.18%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-0.90%
Less than half of MRVL's 4.47%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.23%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.45%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 2.97%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
0.18%
Below half of MRVL's 4.17%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.01%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's 3.23%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
35.24%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 0.73%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.54%
Below half of MRVL's -46.36%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-6.30%
1.25-1.5x MRVL's -4.87%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if there's a competitive advantage in forward billing.
4.45%
Less than half of MRVL's 40.94%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
12.00%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 5.44%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.53%
Less than half of MRVL's 20.83%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
5.56%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
8.70%
Less than half of MRVL's -11.72%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
23.33%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 1.66%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-0.03%
Less than half of MRVL's 15.13%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.54%
Less than half of MRVL's 12.97%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.01%
Below half MRVL's -13.17%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-200.00%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.49%
Below half MRVL's -0.53%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
7.01%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's 3.23%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-99.71%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-0.31%
Less than half of MRVL's 20.83%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-58.65%
Less than half of MRVL's 43.73%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
