PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-7.42
Negative P/E while AVGO shows 27.17. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
9.00
Similar P/S to AVGO's 9.06. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
2.58
P/B 50-75% of AVGO's 3.80. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
49.25
P/FCF less than half of AVGO's 129.06. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this discount.
42.05
P/OCF less than half of AVGO's 100.73. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
2.58
Fair value ratio 50-75% of AVGO's 3.80. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-3.37%
Negative earnings while AVGO shows yield of 0.92%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
2.03%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.77%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.