PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
19.07
Positive P/E while AVGO shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.27
P/S 50-75% of AVGO's 16.39. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
3.53
Similar P/B to AVGO's 3.59. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
31.84
P/FCF 50-75% of AVGO's 58.48. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if capital allocation explains the gap.
30.91
P/OCF 50-75% of AVGO's 50.13. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
3.53
Similar fair value ratio to AVGO's 3.59. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
1.31%
Positive earnings while AVGO shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
3.14%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 1.71%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.