PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
21.15
Similar P/E to TSM's 25.56. Guy Spier would investigate if similar multiples are justified by similar prospects.
7.27
P/S less than half of TSM's 40.05. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
6.87
P/B of 6.87 while TSM has zero book value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset quality advantage.
-103.05
Negative FCF while TSM shows P/FCF of 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-171.75
Negative operating cash flow while TSM shows P/OCF of 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
6.87
Fair value ratio of 6.87 while TSM has zero value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine valuation methodology.
1.18%
Earnings yield 1.25-1.5x TSM's 0.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if higher yield reflects opportunity.
-0.97%
FCF yield 6-8% - Fair value range. Seth Klarman would verify if yield provides sufficient margin of safety. Check Working Capital efficiency.