PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
41.74
P/E 50-75% of TSM's 62.68. Mohnish Pabrai would examine if this pricing gap presents opportunity.
21.54
P/S 50-75% of TSM's 33.38. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
10.63
P/B of 10.63 while TSM has zero book value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset quality advantage.
163.51
P/FCF of 163.51 while TSM has no FCF. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cash flow quality advantage.
96.47
P/OCF of 96.47 while TSM has no operating cash flow. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational advantage.
10.63
Fair value ratio of 10.63 while TSM has zero value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine valuation methodology.
0.60%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.40%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
0.61%
FCF yield 6-8% - Fair value range. Seth Klarman would verify if yield provides sufficient margin of safety. Check Working Capital efficiency.