PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
33.90
Similar P/E to TSM's 36.78. Guy Spier would investigate if similar multiples are justified by similar prospects.
16.36
Similar P/S to TSM's 19.59. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
9.92
P/B of 9.92 while TSM has zero book value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset quality advantage.
-3398.36
Negative FCF while TSM shows P/FCF of 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
311.15
P/OCF of 311.15 while TSM has no operating cash flow. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational advantage.
9.92
Fair value ratio of 9.92 while TSM has zero value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine valuation methodology.
0.74%
Similar earnings yield to TSM's 0.68%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar yields reflect similar quality.
-0.03%
FCF yield 6-8% - Fair value range. Seth Klarman would verify if yield provides sufficient margin of safety. Check Working Capital efficiency.