PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-13.14
Negative P/E while TSM shows 14.52. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
7.12
P/S less than half of TSM's 19.12. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
2.39
P/B 50-75% of TSM's 3.27. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
231.53
P/FCF above 1.5x TSM's 82.70. Michael Burry would check for cash flow deterioration risks.
78.49
P/OCF 1.25-1.5x TSM's 57.87. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better business model.
2.39
Fair value ratio 50-75% of TSM's 3.27. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-1.90%
Negative earnings while TSM shows yield of 1.72%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
0.43%
FCF yield below 50% of TSM's 1.21%. Michael Burry would check for cash flow deterioration risks.