PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-7.25
Negative P/E while TSM shows 12.54. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
8.91
P/S 50-75% of TSM's 17.79. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
1.79
P/B 50-75% of TSM's 3.31. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-68.21
Negative FCF while TSM shows P/FCF of 84.96. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-215.92
Negative operating cash flow while TSM shows P/OCF of 26.43. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
1.79
Fair value ratio 50-75% of TSM's 3.31. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-3.45%
Negative earnings while TSM shows yield of 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-1.47%
Negative FCF while TSM shows yield of 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.