PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-7.42
Negative P/E while TSM shows 11.83. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
9.00
P/S 50-75% of TSM's 17.28. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
2.58
Similar P/B to TSM's 3.02. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
49.25
Positive FCF while TSM shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
42.05
P/OCF 1.1-1.25x TSM's 34.61. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior operating efficiency.
2.58
Similar fair value ratio to TSM's 3.02. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-3.37%
Negative earnings while TSM shows yield of 2.11%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
2.03%
Positive FCF while TSM shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.