PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-16.90
Negative P/E while TSM shows 9.74. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
9.17
P/S 50-75% of TSM's 14.96. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
3.17
Similar P/B to TSM's 3.19. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
60.59
Positive FCF while TSM shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
52.67
P/OCF above 1.5x TSM's 32.08. Michael Burry would check for operating cash flow deterioration risks.
3.17
Similar fair value ratio to TSM's 3.19. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-1.48%
Negative earnings while TSM shows yield of 2.57%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
1.65%
Positive FCF while TSM shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.