PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-9.33
Negative P/E while TSM shows 13.01. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
6.48
P/S less than half of TSM's 16.93. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
1.90
P/B 50-75% of TSM's 3.32. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-1593.33
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
153.10
P/OCF above 1.5x TSM's 29.67. Michael Burry would check for operating cash flow deterioration risks.
1.90
Fair value ratio 50-75% of TSM's 3.32. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-2.68%
Negative earnings while TSM shows yield of 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-0.06%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.