PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-8.80
Negative P/E while Technology median is 7.16. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
3.98
P/S 50-90% of Technology median of 6.37. Mohnish Pabrai would investigate if this pricing gap presents opportunity.
1.95
P/B near Technology median of 1.83. Charlie Munger would verify if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
19.65
P/FCF 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 13.79. Guy Spier would scrutinize if premium reflects better capital allocation.
18.75
P/OCF near Technology median of 18.75. Charlie Munger would verify if industry-standard multiples reflect business reality.
1.95
Fair value ratio near Technology median of 1.83. Charlie Munger would verify if industry valuation norms make sense.
-2.84%
Negative earnings while Technology median yield is 0.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
5.09%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if high yield reflects hidden value.