PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-7.25
Negative P/E while Technology median is 6.08. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
8.91
P/S exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.87. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
1.79
P/B 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 1.25. Guy Spier would scrutinize if premium reflects better asset utilization.
-68.21
Negative FCF while Technology median P/FCF is 12.48. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-215.92
Negative operating cash flow while Technology median P/OCF is 14.12. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
1.79
Fair value ratio 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 1.25. Guy Spier would scrutinize if premium reflects durable advantages.
-3.45%
Negative earnings while Technology median yield is 1.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-1.47%
Negative FCF while Technology median yield is 1.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.