PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
38.78%
Some net income increase while CGAU is negative at -43.05%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while CGAU is 145.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1018.81%
Well above CGAU's 214.22% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-56.56%
Negative yoy SBC while CGAU is 31.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-139.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CGAU at -91.45%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-108.31%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with CGAU at -992.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-118.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with CGAU at -706.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-232.42%
Negative yoy AP while CGAU is 230.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
141.65%
Growth well above CGAU's 14.97%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
32.17%
Some yoy increase while CGAU is negative at -102.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
51.11%
Some CFO growth while CGAU is negative at -97.20%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
7.01%
Some CapEx rise while CGAU is negative at -62.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.31%
Negative yoy purchasing while CGAU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.85%
Growth well above CGAU's 89.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
41.89%
Investing outflow well above CGAU's 16.24%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-2953.68%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CGAU is 2.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2461.51%
We slightly raise equity while CGAU is negative at -35.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.