PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-34.40%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with DC at -72.63%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.73%
Some D&A expansion while DC is negative at -2.67%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.82%
Both cut yoy SBC, with DC at -14.91%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-268.70%
Negative yoy working capital usage while DC is 216.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-40.48%
AR is negative yoy while DC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.98%
Negative yoy usage while DC is 105.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-188.16%
Negative yoy while DC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-60.31%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with DC at -17.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-15.70%
Negative yoy CapEx while DC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.54%
Growth of 6.54% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
6.03%
We expand invests by 6.03% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
46.60%
Debt repayment growth of 46.60% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1019.28%
We slightly raise equity while DC is negative at -99.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.