PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.12%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x DC's 99.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with DC at -99.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.54%
Less SBC growth vs. DC's 24.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-965.20%
Both reduce yoy usage, with DC at -99.94%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
408.26%
AR growth well above DC's 100.10%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
144.37%
Inventory growth of 144.37% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
76.31%
AP growth well above DC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-131113.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with DC at -99.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
327.94%
Growth of 327.94% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
38.14%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of DC's 99.90%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-381.56%
Negative yoy CapEx while DC is 99.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
202.09%
Purchases growth of 202.09% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
6873.76%
Liquidation growth of 6873.76% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-381.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with DC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1020.15%
We reduce yoy invests while DC stands at 99.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
118288.35%
Debt repayment growth of 118288.35% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while DC is negative at -100.08%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.