PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.16%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with DC at -10.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.08%
Deferred tax of 13.08% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-14.73%
Negative yoy SBC while DC is 10.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
117.07%
Slight usage while DC is negative at -103.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-880.42%
AR is negative yoy while DC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
459.87%
Inventory growth of 459.87% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-13.18%
Both reduce yoy usage, with DC at -103.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-29.97%
Negative yoy while DC is 2154.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
7.62%
Some CFO growth while DC is negative at -41.24%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-0.10%
Negative yoy CapEx while DC is 26.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
99.99%
Acquisition growth of 99.99% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while DC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with DC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-50.57%
We reduce yoy invests while DC stands at 19.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-103.34%
We cut debt repayment yoy while DC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while DC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.