PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1589.95%
Some net income increase while FURY is negative at -120.19%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-25.20%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FURY at -47.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-205.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FURY at -154.67%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-200.85%
AR is negative yoy while FURY is 4.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
33.68%
Inventory growth of 33.68% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
214.57%
AP growth of 214.57% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-100.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FURY at -138.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-67.42%
Negative yoy while FURY is 909.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
15.60%
Some CFO growth while FURY is negative at -51.25%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-43.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -128000.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-227.26%
Negative yoy purchasing while FURY stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-193.06%
We reduce yoy sales while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-46.90%
We reduce yoy other investing while FURY is 7829.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-75.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -2597.78%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.06%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FURY's 17.46%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.