PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-3.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FURY at -23.75%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FURY at -2.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
130.66%
Deferred tax of 130.66% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-27.19%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FURY at -65.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
118.30%
Well above FURY's 171.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
19.06%
AR growth while FURY is negative at -135.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
36.01%
Inventory growth of 36.01% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
193.20%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FURY's 592.31%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
92.05%
Some yoy increase while FURY is negative at -51.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
573.30%
Some CFO growth while FURY is negative at -46.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-74.64%
Negative yoy CapEx while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.09%
We reduce yoy other investing while FURY is 9.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-718.24%
We reduce yoy invests while FURY stands at 9.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FURY is 6.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
521.04%
We slightly raise equity while FURY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.