PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-58.14%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FURY at -101.94%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.78%
Deferred tax of 14.78% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
10.55%
SBC growth while FURY is negative at -20.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
262.00%
Well above FURY's 224.42% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-36.13%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FURY at -2150.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
30.98%
Inventory growth of 30.98% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
185.21%
AP growth of 185.21% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-61.71%
Negative yoy usage while FURY is 425.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
258.17%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. FURY's 865.41%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
7.40%
Some CFO growth while FURY is negative at -62.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-33.86%
Negative yoy CapEx while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
531.11%
We have some outflow growth while FURY is negative at -13.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-28.61%
We reduce yoy invests while FURY stands at 151.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
93.35%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FURY's 22.03%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-87.81%
Negative yoy issuance while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.