10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
38.78%
Some net income increase while FURY is negative at -274.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while FURY is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1018.81%
Deferred tax of 1018.81% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-56.56%
Negative yoy SBC while FURY is 57.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-139.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FURY at -49.09%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-108.31%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FURY at -142.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-118.82%
Negative yoy inventory while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-232.42%
Negative yoy AP while FURY is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
141.65%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FURY's 22500.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
32.17%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. FURY's 219.01%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
51.11%
Some CFO growth while FURY is negative at -32.47%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
7.01%
Lower CapEx growth vs. FURY's 99.74%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.31%
Negative yoy purchasing while FURY stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.85%
We have some outflow growth while FURY is negative at -97.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
41.89%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. FURY's 142.05%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-2953.68%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2461.51%
Issuance growth of 2461.51% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.