PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.16%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FURY at -27.37%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.08%
Deferred tax of 13.08% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-14.73%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FURY at -55.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
117.07%
Slight usage while FURY is negative at -723.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-880.42%
AR is negative yoy while FURY is 57.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
459.87%
Inventory growth of 459.87% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-13.18%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FURY at -305.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-29.97%
Negative yoy while FURY is 25.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
7.62%
Some CFO growth while FURY is negative at -86.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-0.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -337.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
99.99%
Acquisition growth of 99.99% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -8.54%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-50.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -2513.51%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-103.34%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -2.13%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.