10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.12%
Some net income increase while IAUX is negative at -467.22%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while IAUX is 28.61%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.54%
Less SBC growth vs. IAUX's 673.58%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-965.20%
Both reduce yoy usage, with IAUX at -4.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
408.26%
AR growth while IAUX is negative at -102.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
144.37%
Inventory growth well above IAUX's 33.80%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
76.31%
Lower AP growth vs. IAUX's 1050.61%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-131113.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with IAUX at -206.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
327.94%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. IAUX's 2931.28%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
38.14%
Some CFO growth while IAUX is negative at -551.32%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-381.56%
Negative yoy CapEx while IAUX is 10.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while IAUX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
202.09%
Purchases growth of 202.09% while IAUX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
6873.76%
Liquidation growth of 6873.76% while IAUX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-381.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with IAUX at -1.40%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1020.15%
We reduce yoy invests while IAUX stands at 6.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
118288.35%
We repay more while IAUX is negative at -6.89%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while IAUX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.