PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
169.04%
Net income growth under 50% of ITRG's 982.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.35%
Negative yoy SBC while ITRG is 73.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-176.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ITRG at -108.65%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-96.76%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ITRG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-147.75%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ITRG at -62.11%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-204.49%
Negative yoy usage while ITRG is 32.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-102.63%
Both negative yoy, with ITRG at -172.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-76.96%
Negative yoy CFO while ITRG is 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
99.67%
CapEx growth of 99.67% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-342.87%
We reduce yoy other investing while ITRG is 110.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
96.24%
We have mild expansions while ITRG is negative at -194.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-106.76%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ITRG is 7.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-32.80%
Negative yoy issuance while ITRG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.