PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.12%
Some net income increase while ITRG is negative at -87.70%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while ITRG is 5.53%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.54%
SBC growth while ITRG is negative at -24.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-965.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ITRG is 89.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
408.26%
AR growth well above ITRG's 90.53%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
144.37%
Inventory growth of 144.37% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
76.31%
AP growth well above ITRG's 32.86%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-131113.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ITRG at -62.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
327.94%
Well above ITRG's 155.85%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
38.14%
Some CFO growth while ITRG is negative at -25.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-381.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with ITRG at -667.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
202.09%
Some yoy expansion while ITRG is negative at -64.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
6873.76%
Liquidation growth of 6873.76% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-381.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with ITRG at -52.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1020.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with ITRG at -662.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
118288.35%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ITRG's 50.67%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.