PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.48%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 38.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-34.62%
Negative yoy D&A while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.32%
SBC growth while THM is negative at -1782.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-1586.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with THM at -219.98%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
571.23%
AR growth well above THM's 42.33%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-521.44%
Both reduce yoy usage, with THM at -198.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-99.14%
Both negative yoy, with THM at -2509.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-487.38%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with THM at -37.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
62.77%
CapEx growth of 62.77% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.65%
Growth of 33.65% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
59.07%
We expand invests by 59.07% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-635.38%
We cut debt repayment yoy while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.