PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
474.29%
Net income growth above 1.5x THM's 29.69%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1002.94%
D&A growth well above THM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
9.24%
Deferred tax of 9.24% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
97.96%
SBC growth well above THM's 105.79%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
89.78%
Well above THM's 57.13% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-484.38%
AR is negative yoy while THM is 679.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.48%
Growth well above THM's 46.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-1565.50%
Negative yoy while THM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
219.93%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x THM's 36.64%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
21.68%
CapEx growth of 21.68% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.37%
Growth of 211.37% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
60.70%
We expand invests by 60.70% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
72.38%
Debt repayment growth of 72.38% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.