PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
129.11%
Net income growth above 1.5x THM's 25.91%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.97%
D&A growth of 0.97% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-67.99%
Negative yoy deferred tax while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
679.93%
SBC growth while THM is negative at -0.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
445.84%
Well above THM's 175.19% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
146.96%
AR growth while THM is negative at -691.60%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
205.15%
Inventory growth of 205.15% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
141.44%
Growth well above THM's 204.76%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-95.94%
Both negative yoy, with THM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
47.95%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 39.81%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-20.19%
Negative yoy CapEx while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
83.25%
Growth of 83.25% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
71.92%
We expand invests by 71.92% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
98.75%
Debt repayment growth of 98.75% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-73.92%
Negative yoy issuance while THM is 4811.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.