10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-367.69%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 29.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
79.45%
SBC growth while THM is negative at -73.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1045.11%
Slight usage while THM is negative at -168.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-443.07%
AR is negative yoy while THM is 1396.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
387.33%
Inventory growth of 387.33% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50040.00%
Some yoy usage while THM is negative at -333.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
7842.82%
Growth of 7842.82% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
818.43%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x THM's 4.57%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-10059.82%
Negative yoy CapEx while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
53.39%
Growth of 53.39% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-14944.25%
We reduce yoy invests while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
861.94%
Debt repayment growth of 861.94% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.