10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.36%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.36%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
18.69%
Net income growth under 50% of CGAU's 190.55%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
19.08%
EPS growth under 50% of CGAU's 188.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
19.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of CGAU's 188.25%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.98%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-17.98%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.25%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 271.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-21.25%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 271.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-21.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 271.43%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
44.00%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 11.23%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
44.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 11.23%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
44.00%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 11.23%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.86%
AR growth well above CGAU's 126.60%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.43%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.44%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.97%
We cut SG&A while CGAU invests at 129.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.