PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.77%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 23.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-144.77%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 23.96%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-124.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-124.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-124.53%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-166.84%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 129.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-166.84%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 15.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.69%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 41.61%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-101.69%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 41.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-101.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 41.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-426.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 88.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-426.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 88.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-426.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 88.74%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
25.40%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 13.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
25.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 13.65%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
25.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 13.65%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.75%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.50%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 0.65%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.51%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 1.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.44%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.