10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.15%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-212.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-694.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-685.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-685.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.96%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-30.32%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.71%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-151.71%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-151.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
13.47%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of CGAU's 21.54%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
13.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of CGAU's 21.54%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
13.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 12.18%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.89%
AR growth well above CGAU's 40.10%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-83.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.82%
Positive asset growth while CGAU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.29%
1.25-1.5x CGAU's 3.82%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.00%
SG&A growth well above CGAU's 64.67%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.