PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-310.14%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 175.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-311.34%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 175.09%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-265.20%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 125.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-265.45%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 125.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-265.45%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 125.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-293.70%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 467.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-247.94%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 217.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-322.65%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 239.05%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-322.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 239.05%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-322.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 386.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1676.68%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 108.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1676.68%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 108.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1676.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 61.95%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-0.73%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 17.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-0.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 17.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-0.73%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 6.27%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.20%
AR growth well above CGAU's 10.83%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1292.45%
We show growth while CGAU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-4.69%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 4.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.07%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
311.34%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.