PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.14%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-44.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
8.66%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.66%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
38.81%
Share change of 38.81% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
38.81%
Diluted share change of 38.81% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-314.73%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-321.61%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-469.67%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 106.28%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-469.67%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 106.28%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-469.67%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 791.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-301.52%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 835.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-301.52%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 835.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-301.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 1657.98%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-43.55%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 61.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-43.55%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 61.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-43.55%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 27.44%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
88.11%
AR growth well above CGAU's 48.99%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.71%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 9.43%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-13.33%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 12.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.25%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.