PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.95%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 1124.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.95%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 1124.17%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-22.57%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 804.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-22.89%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 828.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-22.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 828.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.43%
OCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 660.20%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
76.02%
FCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 180.92%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.22%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 2510.09%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-23.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 2510.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-23.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 4038.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
88.83%
Below 50% of CGAU's 2107.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
88.83%
Below 50% of CGAU's 2107.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
88.83%
Below 50% of CGAU's 625.58%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-77.26%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 80.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-77.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 80.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.26%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 57.10%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.36%
Firm’s AR is declining while CGAU shows 186.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-619524.61%
Inventory is declining while CGAU stands at 19.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
88.59%
Asset growth above 1.5x CGAU's 15.03%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
72.07%
BV/share growth above 1.5x CGAU's 13.65%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.15%
SG&A declining or stable vs. CGAU's 227.47%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.