PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.12%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
35.73%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
54.25%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
54.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
40.22%
Share change of 40.22% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
40.22%
Diluted share change of 40.22% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.37%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 3.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-482.29%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 4.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 255.54%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-91.34%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 307.11%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-91.34%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 366.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
13.40%
Below 50% of CGAU's 926.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
13.40%
Below 50% of CGAU's 586.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
13.40%
Below 50% of CGAU's 550.13%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-51.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 109.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-51.58%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 93.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-51.58%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 64.10%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
210.89%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above CGAU's 14.46%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.57%
Asset growth at 50-75% of CGAU's 7.98%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-28.71%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 10.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.51%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.