PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-269.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-86.76%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
22.89%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-253.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3005.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.31%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 1187.64%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-80.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 402.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-253.02%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
94.22%
Below 50% of CGAU's 1042.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
94.22%
Below 50% of CGAU's 3782.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-349.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 70.57%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-80.51%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 118.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-80.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 99.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-24.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 83.40%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
498.50%
AR growth well above CGAU's 5.57%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above CGAU's 15.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.48%
Asset growth well under 50% of CGAU's 4.95%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.35%
1.25-1.5x CGAU's 5.40%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.40%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.